Sev Feat

A State-by-State comparison of the Severance Tax

 

 

 

 

 

Each state creates their own tax structure and budget based on their unique demographics and economies. Yes, Pennsylvania is the largest natural gas producing state without a severance tax, BUT Pennsylvania is also the only state with an impact fee raising $225 million and is home to the second highest income tax rate in the nation. Comparing Pennsylvania’s tax rates to those of other states is not so black and white.

However, in the case of the proposed severance tax for Pennsylvania it is important to look at how other states tax oil and gas companies.

An important note about the severance tax in West Virginia is that it’s a five percent severance tax imposed on the natural gas industry as well as oil, coal, limestone/sandstone, sand, gravel, and other natural resources. Pennsylvania does not impose a severance tax on any of these industries. Also, West Virginia’s income tax is 6.5 percent while Pennsylvania taxes at a 9.9 percent rate.

Unlike the proposed severance tax for Pennsylvania, in West Virginia the revenue generated by the severance tax on oil and gas is placed in a fund established by the State Treasurer’s Office. That fund is then distributed much like Pennsylvania’s impact fees. 75 percent is distributed to oil and gas producing counties while the other 25 percent is spread across all counties based on population.

A five percent rate on just the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania along with the 9.9 percent income tax could have a dramatic effect on the Pennsylvania economy and job market. Unlike West Virginia the proposed severance tax for Pennsylvania would only be applied to the oil and gas industry. Not to mention the revenue that it could generate would become part of state budget instead of being directly returned to the counties who are home to the oil and gas industry.

Like the proposed Pennsylvania severance tax, West Virginia’s tax is an extraction tax, meaning that the gas is taxed when it is extracted and before it is sold, or “profitable.” In Texas however, they have a higher severance tax rate at 7.5 percent that is placed on all gas extracted from a well once that well has become profitable. Meaning, that oil and gas extracted in Texas is not taxable until the oil and gas from any one well brings in enough revenue to cover the cost of that well. In Texas, oil and gas companies are not taxed until they break even on their well.

While a 7.5 percent tax might seem high, and thus highly profitable for the state, when you compare the overall tax rates of Pennsylvania to other states, the proposed severance tax is still higher than Texas. This is due to Pennsylvania’s high income tax rate of 9.9 percent compared to Texas who does not have a corporate income tax that oil and gas companies must pay like they do in Pennsylvania.

Just recently the Ohio House of Representatives voted in favor of a proposed increase to the state severance tax on oil and gas from a low rate of less than 1 percent to a modest 2.5 percent. Similar to West Virginia and the impact fees in Pennsylvania, the Ohio bill currently stipulates where the revenue from their severance tax will go. A portion goes to the Department of Natural Resources and 17.5 percent is allocated to benefit local governments. However, a big difference in Ohio is that the largest portion of the revenue goes back to the state to help fund income tax relief.

Ohio’s proposed 2.5 percent severance tax is still less than the proposed 5 percent in Pennsylvania, making Ohio a more profitable option for oil and gas companies if the Pennsylvania severance tax were to be voted into law. Over the last few years oil and gas operations have been declining slightly in Pennsylvania due to market prices of natural gas and the competitive nature of the industry. However, in Ohio operations have been steadily increasing.

Without a severance tax Pennsylvania is towards the top for state collections already. Part of the high ranking has to do with population size. However, Ohio is only nine percent smaller in terms of population size but has 24 percent less tax revenue even with a 2.5 percent severance tax.

What do PA voters want?
PA residents weigh in: New jobs vs. Taxes
The following two tabs change content below.

George Stark

Director, External Affairs at Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
George grew up in Western PA, graduated from Dickinson College and has been involved in Public Policy matters since then. He has worked in Harrisburg and Pittsburgh on energy issues with a focus on Local, State and Federal matters. As the Director, External Affairs at Cabot Oil & Gas Corp, George directs the media, community and legislative relations for the company.

Latest posts by George Stark (see all)

This Post Has 5 Comments

  1. I’ve never seen a good summation, however, as to how much PA Gas and Oil companies are paying in income taxes. Without knowing that you can’t really compare severance taxes in each state. One report I saw recently suggested that gas drillers in PA were now mostly avoiding paying income taxes. Also, as per Ohio, isn’t the Utica more expensive to drill than Marcellus and so higher severance taxes in PA would not necessarily make Marcellus gas recovery less economical the Utica.

  2. I understand there are a limited number of drilling rigs out there and if I were an oil company with leases in PA, OH and WV I would take those rigs to OH or WV where my return on investment would be greater than PA if such a tax were to be passed in PA. Being a landowner with 80 acres leased (but not yet drilled on) I don’t want anything standing in the way of my lease being included in an active unit where wet gas is extracted and my 17% royalties are paid. The state already took a sizable share of my lease bonus payment back in 2012 and yes they will take a sizable portion of my income (my wife and I both work) should I receive royalties which would put us into the higher income bracket. If the majority of the income would come only to the counties where it is extracted I might be in favor of something like Ohio is charging but not one dime should go to the major population centers across Pennsylvania because they don’t have a dog in this fight. We understand and accept that to receive the royalties some of us will lose land to a pad and we will deal with the traffic and noise from such operations. We accept that because the financial benefit to us and all our neighbors (included in the drilling units) who will receive royalties will be better off. Mr. Wolf, if he gets his way, is going to cause all of those who own property, that could be drilled but won’t if his NEW tax is passed, the opportunity to experience the added income royalties would bring to our communities.

  3. […] This 4.7% rate happens to be exactly what West Virginia charges, but that state allows several credits against its tax rate, which means Pennsylvania’s impact fee will, at the end of day, likely produce a higher average tax than West Virginia’s for 2015. Governor Wolf said his plan was modeled after West Virginia, but we already have a tax in the impact fee that is able to produce more revenue at the low prices we’re now seeing. We have, on top of that, a corporate income tax that is one of the highest in the land at 9.9% versus West Virginia’s 6…. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: